A new dawn for aquaculture in the Pacific Northwest

In the debate over global warming and ocean
acidification, most reasonable people say we should listen to NOAA scientists
and give credence to NOAA data.  Yet,
regarding aquaculture, many of these same people don’t listen to NOAA
scientists or give credence to their data. 

Guest Commentary
By John Dentler and Jeanne McKnight

The United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization (FAO) notes that 90 percent of the world’s fisheries are at
capacity or have been overfished.  By the
year 2030—a mere decade away—the world population will reach 8.3 billion.
That’s 8.3 billion mouths to feed with a decreasing amount of arable land for
agriculture.

Meet the solution:  The Blue Revolution.

Around the world, countries like Norway,
Scotland, New Zealand, Ecuador, Brazil, India, Thailand and China—to name a
few—have embraced aquaculture for decades. 
In the case of Asia, aquaculture has been around for thousands of years
producing locally farmed protein and, more recently, robust economic
development.

Unfortunately, the United States has fallen
behind many countries, currently ranking #16 in aquaculture production. 

The Northwest Aquaculture Alliance (NWAA)
believes it is time for the United States, specifically our West Coast region,
to embrace aquaculture as a public health, economic development, and food
security strategy.

Research demonstrate the correlation
between regular seafood consumption and human health.  Diets low in seafood result in chronic health
issues such as cardiovascular disease, contributing to 84,000 preventable
deaths in the United States annually. 
Consumers need to eat more seafood; aquaculture makes seafood accessible
and affordable.

Farming fish, shellfish, and seaweed also
supports community economic development. According to the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), fish harvested from aquaculture around the
globe had an estimated first-sale value of US $160.2 billion, divided among
finfish, shellfish, and crustaceans—using less than 4 percent of the ocean.

In the debate over global warming and ocean
acidification, most reasonable people say we should listen to NOAA scientists
and give credence to NOAA data.  Yet,
regarding aquaculture, many of these same people don’t listen to NOAA scientists
or give credence to their data.  This
double standard sets back aquaculture, hurts our rural communities, and harms
the overall health of consumers. 

Now we are, once again, at a crossroads in
Washington as Cooke Aquaculture Pacific seeks to gain the state’s approval to
raise all-female sterile rainbow trout and, in a joint venture with the
Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe, rear native black cod and sterile rainbow trout.

We support these efforts.

In the United States, most people do not
consume the amount of seafood needed for good health.  A significant benefit of aquaculture is that
it delivers a nutritious product that consumers want at a price they can
afford.  We cannot harvest more wild
seafood.  We must import our seafood or,
conversely, produce more of it here in the USA. 
We believe Cooke’s proposal and the Jamestown Tribe’s proposal is in the
best overall interests, not just of the state, but also the rural communities
where family-wage jobs are desperately needed.

That is not to say that aquaculture, like
any human activity, doesn’t have an environmental footprint, but we work hard
and must continue to work hard to control, mitigate, and reduce that
footprint.  In fact, fish farming has the
lowest environmental footprint of any animal production.

Aquaculture is also highly regulated at the
local, state and federal level.  Here are
just a few federal laws governing “water farming”:

•                Animal
Health Protection Act;

•                Animal
Medicinal Use Drug Clarification Act;

•                Clean
Water Act;

•                Coastal
Zone Management Act;

•                Endangered
Species Act;

•                Federal
Food Drug and Cosmetic Act;

•                Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act;

•                Federal
Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act);

•                Lacey
Act;

•                Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act;

•                Marine
Mammal Protection Act;

•                Migratory
Bird Protection Act;

•                National
Environmental Policy Act;

•                Outer
Continental Shelf Lands Act; and

•                Rivers
and Harbors Act.

We invite those who are interested in
aquaculture, pro or con, to contact us to identify areas of mutual interest and
to discuss solutions that will benefit the region, help its people, including
Tribal Members, and benefit from our shared marine and aquatic environment.

It’s time for Washington and the Pacific Northwest region to join the Blue Revolution.  Let’s work together to make it happen.

John Dentler earned his JD from Seattle University and is President of the Northwest Aquaculture Alliance (www.nwaquaculturealliance.org).   He is also a senior adviser to Troutlodge, the world’s largest producer of eyed trout eggs. Each year Troutlodge produces and sells about 500 million trout eggs worldwide, including sales to Cooke Aquaculture.

Jeanne McKnight, Ph.D., has been involved in strategic communications and public affairs for 25 years, specializing in fisheries and aquaculture, both regionally and globally.  She currently serves as the Executive Director of NWAA.

(Image courtesy of Cooke Inc.)